Capturing Adolf Eichmann: Operation Finale

In 1961, Israel captured one of the greatest villains of the 20th century, the architect of “The Final Solution,” Adolf Eichmann. Israeli agents, undercover in Argentina, found him there under an alias and clandestinely brought him to Israel for trial. For many, his capture sparked excitement and pride, but for some, his capture brought condemnation. The trial gave voice to Holocaust survivors and brought their experience into Israel’s national consciousness. This video discusses Israel’s initiative, process and action. It grapples with the international response and big questions: Why did the sovereign state of Israel feel compelled to try Eichmann, when he committed crimes against all Jews even before Israel’s existence? Was Israel justified in breaking international law for this purpose? Why was this trial an inflection point in how the Holocaust was discussed for Israelis and Jews across the world.

  1. Who coined the phrase the “banality of evil” and what does it mean?
  2. Why were some countries and individuals upset about Eichmann’s capture?
  3. What impact did the Eichmann trial have on Israeli society?
  4. In what country did Eichmann reside after the Holocaust?
    • Venezuela
    • Argentina
    • Germany
    • Austria
  5. Which famous Nazi hunter was instrumental in finding Eichmann?
    • Simon Wiesenthal
    • David Ben-Gurion
    • Efraim Zuroff
    • Jacob Blaustein
  1. Israel decided, to the chagrin of some American Jewish leaders, to try Eichmann in Israel despite his crimes having taken place in Europe, before Israel even existed. What do you think of this decision? Explain why it made sense to do it in Israel, and why it might have made sense to do it in Europe.
  2. In capturing Eichmann abroad and smuggling him into Israel, Israel technically broke international law. Is this justified in light of what Israel accomplished? Can breaking the law be okay under certain circumstances? Consider the Heinz Dilemma when discussing this question.
  3. In his testimony, Eichmann claimed he was just doing his job, like everyone else. Evidence proved otherwise and he was executed. But his claim begs the question: should a person be punished for following orders, or only if one planned the results? Does intention matter?
  1. Play “spectrum” with your students. Designate one side of the room as agree and the other side as disagree. Have them stand along the spectrum where they most identify based on the statements below. After moving to where they most agree, students should discuss with the other students there why they chose that area and then open the conversation to the whole group to explain their stances. Students may change where they stand based on the conversation.
    • “Eichmann should have been tried in Israel rather than in Europe”
    • “Israel’s abduction of Eichmann in Argentina was a step too far”
    • “Any steps are legitimate for Nazi hunters to find their targets”
    • “The capture and execution of Adolf Eichmann was justice for Holocaust survivors”
  2. Give your students 5 minutes to “free write” their response to the following statement: “One can do evil without being evil – Hannah Arendt”. In their response they should reference the trial of Adolf Eichmann, but they can also give other examples.
  3. Engage your students in an experiential learning activity around the theme of Self-Determination, a theme found in the accompanying video.
  4. Give your students our Kahoot on Adolf Eichmann!
  1. In deciding to try Eichmann in Israel, David Ben-Gurion had a clear educational objective, saying, “Israeli youth should learn the truth of what had happened to the Jews of Europe between 1933 and 1945.” Why do you think this was such an important lesson to Ben-Gurion, who himself did not go through the Holocaust?
  2. Israelis, and people around the world, were shocked when Israel announced that it had captured Eichmann. What do you think this moment meant to Holocaust survivors around the world? What feelings do you imagine they felt?
  3. For many Holocaust survivors, the Eichmann trial gave voice to their experiences and opened up the floor for them to recount their personal horror stories. Previously, the Holocaust had been a taboo topic in nascent Israel, which was set on creating a new, invincible Jew. Are there any topics in your life that you feel are “taboo”? What are they and why are they not spoken about?
  1. Unpacking Israeli History Podcast, “Eichmann: the controversy of justice”
  2. Ofer Aderet, “An Inside Look at Israel’s Operation to Capture Nazi Criminal Adolf Eichmann”
  3. Dr. Françoise S. Ouzan, “The Eichmann Trial and American Jewry: A Reassessment”
  4. Yad Vashem website
  5. Israel State Archives

Unlock these resources with a free account

Don’t have an account? Sign up now

Experiential Learning is a proactive way to educate with a focus on reflection and can take place in any academic setting: day school, supplementary school, camp, youth group, synagogue, college campus or university. 

A division of

Legal Privacy Policy © 2022 All rights reserved

Access these resources with a free account!

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Unlock the interactive quiz with a free account

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Access the transcript with a free account!

Don't have an account? Sign up now

By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. We use cookies to provide you with a great experience and to help our website run effectively.